{"call_id":"call_1a20a058","run_id":"20261015T170957Z-suite-crb_papers-baseline-dae0c1/crb_papers.q113/e1a1","step":"analysis","kind":"llm","name":"llm.analyst.baseline","version":"","code_version":"2925aeab2262","inputs":{"tools":["calc__annuity","calc__breakeven","calc__combine","calc__discount","calc__fiscal_impact","core__atkinson","core__equivalent_variation","core__fgt","core__gini","core__indirect_incidence","core__kakwani","core__mvpf","core__palma","core__quantile_shares","core__reynolds_smolensky","core__scale_effect","core__theil","core__welfare_change","data__cite","data__describe","data__siconfi","data__sidra","evidence__pool_dl","infer__ate","infer__density_test","infer__did_2x2","infer__did_staggered","infer__event_study","infer__fe","infer__fisher_exact","infer__iv_2sls","infer__linear_hypothesis","infer__mde","infer__neyman","infer__ols","infer__power","infer__randomization_inference","infer__rdd","infer__sample_size","infer__twfe","infer__wald_late","submit_answer"],"exemplars":[]},"input_digest":"","dataset_digests":{},"result":null,"outputs":null,"output_digest":"","params_versions":[],"sources":[],"started_at":"2026-10-15T17:10:00.277669Z","duration_ms":0.0,"error":null,"decided_by":"model","rationale":"","cached":false,"informed_by":[],"model":"rules-1","prompt":"# Role\nYou are MAGI's economist. A municipal analyst in Brazil asks a question; you answer it by choosing registered tools and their arguments. The tools compute every number. Your job is to recognise how the data were generated, pick the tool whose design matches, read what it reports, and say what the result means for the analyst.\n\n# Rules\n1. You never compute a number. Every number in your answer must have been stated by a tool call in this run (a figure, its standard error or interval, a diagnostic, a table cell) or written in the question. No mental arithmetic: for a ratio, difference, sum, product, percent change or share of figures already computed, call calc.combine; to restate a log-point coefficient as a percent or an effect in standard deviations, call core.scale_effect.\n2. Before estimating, work out the design: how units came to be treated (a lottery, an offer with partial take-up, a threshold of a running variable, a policy that started on one date or on different dates, self-selection), what a row is, and which columns hold the outcome, treatment, unit, time, running variable, instrument, cluster and survey weight. Call data.describe when the columns are unclear. Then choose the tool whose \"Use when\" matches and heed its \"Avoid when\".\n3. Read the diagnostics, warnings and \"Check after\" items a result returns before you trust a figure. If a diagnostic says the design fails — a weak instrument, sorting at the cutoff, few clusters, non-parallel pre-trends — say so plainly and do not present the estimate as causal.\n4. If no tool fits the design, or the data cannot identify what is asked, decline and say what is missing. Never invent a design, a column or a number.\n5. A tool that errors or declines returns its reason; fix the arguments and call again, or choose another tool.\n6. Before each tool call, write one sentence on why this tool and these arguments fit the design. It is recorded as your rationale.\n7. Finish with submit_answer. Write the answer in the language of the question (Portuguese: decimal comma), short and direct: the estimate with its uncertainty, the design that identifies it, and what could undermine it. List in figure_refs every figure you quote, as '<call_id>:<key>' (each tool result carries its call_id), and put diagnostics that limit the conclusion in caveats. Write numbers as the tools stated them; do not quote rule-of-thumb thresholds as numbers.\n\n# Datasets\nPass a dataset's id as the `dataset` argument.\n{\n \"id\": \"ds_0078\",\n \"rows\": 4276,\n \"description\": \"| Variable Name     | Description                                                                                     |\\n|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\\n| Unnamed: 0        | Row index carried over from the original export.                                                |\\n| muni_code         | Municipality identifier assigned by Brazil's electoral authority (TSE).                        |\\n| year              | Baseline mayoral election year; 2008 for every row in this extract.                             |\\n| party             | Party abbreviation of the focal mayoral candidate in the 2008 election.                        |\\n| mun_place         | Candidate's finishing position in the 2008 mayoral election: 1=winner, 2=runner-up.              |\\n| gov_party         | Party abbreviation of the state governor for the municipality’s state in that cycle.            |\\n| gov_pct           | Party’s vote share in the gubernatorial election within the municipality (proportion).          |\\n| de_pct            | Party’s vote share for state deputy (deputado estadual) within the municipality (proportion).   |\\n| change            | Candidate ran under a different party in 2012 than in 2008: 1=different party, 0=same party. The exact date of a party change is not recorded. |\\n| attrition         | Candidate did not appear in the 2012 mayoral election (1/0); always 0 in this repeat-candidate extract. |\\n| margin            | Candidate's 2008 mayoral vote margin relative to the win-loss threshold, in proportions; positive for winners and negative for runners-up. |\\n| p_df_pct          | Party’s vote share for federal deputy (deputado federal) in the previous cycle, municipality-level (proportion). |\\n| df_pct            | Party’s vote share for federal deputy (deputado federal) in the current cycle, municipality-level (proportion). |\\n| treat             | Candidate won the 2008 mayoral election: 1=winner, 0=runner-up.                                  |\\n| ineligible        | Candidate was term-limited/ineligible to run in the next mayoral election (1/0); always 0 in this extract. |\\n| p_de_pct          | Party’s vote share for state deputy in the previous cycle, municipality-level (proportion).      |\\n| p_gov_pct         | Party’s vote share for governor in the previous cycle, municipality-level (proportion).          |\\n| p_mun_pct         | Party’s vote share for mayor in the previous municipal election (proportion).                    |\\n| partyIncumbent    | Indicator that the party held the mayor’s office prior to the municipal election (1/0).          |\\n| age               | Age of the focal mayoral candidate (years).                                                     |\\n| max_expenditure   | Reported maximum campaign expenditure for the mayoral candidate (local currency; -1 indicates missing). |\\n| married           | Candidate reported marital status: married (1/0).                                               |\\n| unschooled        | Candidate reported no formal schooling (1/0).                                                   |\\n| tertiary          | Candidate reported tertiary (college/university) education completed (1/0).                     |\\n| female            | Candidate sex: female (1/0).                                                                    |\\n| pt                | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PT (1/0).                                               |\\n| pmdb              | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PMDB (1/0).                                             |\\n| psdb              | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PSDB (1/0).                                             |\\n| pr                | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PR (1/0).                                               |\\n| pfl               | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PFL/DEM (legacy label) (1/0).                           |\\n| ptb               | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PTB (1/0).                                              |\\n| pps               | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PPS (1/0).                                              |\\n| pp                | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PP (1/0).                                               |\\n| pdt               | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PDT (1/0).                                              |\\n| psb               | Indicator that the candidate’s party is PSB (1/0).                                              |\\n| bizz              | Candidate occupation: businessperson/entrepreneur (1/0).                                        |\\n| rural_worker      | Candidate occupation: rural worker (1/0).                                                       |\\n| retiree           | Candidate occupation: retiree/pensioner (1/0).                                                  |\\n| trader            | Candidate occupation: trader/merchant (1/0).                                                    |\\n| public_employee   | Candidate occupation: public employee/civil servant (1/0).                                      |\\n| teacher           | Candidate occupation: teacher (1/0).                                                            |\\n\\nData Description: \\nEach row represents a first- or second-place candidate in Brazil's 2008 municipal mayoral elections. This extract contains 4,276 candidates who were not term-limited and who also appeared as mayoral candidates in 2012; year=2008, ineligible=0, and attrition=0 throughout. Comparing the candidate's party labels in the 2008 and 2012 elections establishes whether they ran under a different party in 2012. The outcome change is a binary party-switching indicator; its mean is a probability on a 0-1 scale. Candidates absent from the 2012 election are excluded, so the question concerns the observed repeat-candidate sample. This selection must be considered when interpreting a causal effect or generalizing beyond that sample.\\n\\nThe data were compiled from election results and candidate-registration records maintained by Brazil's Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE). Municipality identifiers are TSE codes. The file links candidate party affiliations across the two mayoral elections and includes 2008 election placement, vote margins, win indicators, demographics, and occupations. Municipality-level party vote shares for governor, federal deputy (deputado federal), and state deputy (deputado estadual), together with their lagged values, provide additional electoral context; they are separate from the party-switching outcome change. Party labels follow official abbreviations in use during the period, including legacy acronyms.\\n\",\n \"columns\": {\n  \"Unnamed: 0\": \"int64\",\n  \"muni_code\": \"int64\",\n  \"year\": \"int64\",\n  \"party\": \"str\",\n  \"mun_place\": \"int64\",\n  \"gov_party\": \"str\",\n  \"gov_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"de_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"change\": \"int64\",\n  \"attrition\": \"int64\",\n  \"margin\": \"float64\",\n  \"p_df_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"df_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"treat\": \"int64\",\n  \"ineligible\": \"int64\",\n  \"p_de_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"p_gov_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"p_mun_pct\": \"float64\",\n  \"partyIncumbent\": \"float64\",\n  \"age\": \"int64\",\n  \"max_expenditure\": \"int64\",\n  \"married\": \"int64\",\n  \"unschooled\": \"int64\",\n  \"tertiary\": \"int64\",\n  \"female\": \"int64\",\n  \"pt\": \"int64\",\n  \"pmdb\": \"int64\",\n  \"psdb\": \"int64\",\n  \"pr\": \"int64\",\n  \"pfl\": \"int64\",\n  \"ptb\": \"int64\",\n  \"pps\": \"int64\",\n  \"pp\": \"int64\",\n  \"pdt\": \"int64\",\n  \"psb\": \"int64\",\n  \"bizz\": \"int64\",\n  \"rural_worker\": \"int64\",\n  \"retiree\": \"int64\",\n  \"trader\": \"int64\",\n  \"public_employee\": \"int64\",\n  \"teacher\": \"int64\"\n }\n}\n\n# Question\nAmong non-term-limited candidates in Brazil's closely contested 2008 mayoral elections who also ran in 2012, how did winning in 2008 affect the probability of running under a different party in 2012?","response":"submit_answer({\"answer\": \"Pelas regras deste roteador não identifiquei um desenho que responda à pergunta; nenhuma estimativa foi feita.\", \"figure_refs\": [], \"caveats\": []})","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"meta":{"turn_call_id":"call_1a20a058","text":"","tool_calls":[{"vendor_id":"baseline_answer","llm_name":"submit_answer","tool_id":null,"args":{"answer":"Pelas regras deste roteador não identifiquei um desenho que responda à pergunta; nenhuma estimativa foi feita.","figure_refs":[],"caveats":[]}}],"request":{"system_stable_ref":"433a6877aa6a378bbd4b7e2752e484d8cb7499c562d68222be231f62ff2fa420","system_task_ref":"e07a761b02aeca1b478b0853211a8db31ab6df4b43ddcfbf455cd36a7d112f98","tools_ref":"52ab03d8ec104abb85572294bf8a469d75c5de9e74d6042caabff8017adc572b","contents_refs":[],"messages_refs":["dd837b7d129fcc205ccfb2c9af94eb321e69584e3c7f7b08c77c63756ee320dc"],"config":{}},"attempts":[],"response_id":null,"finish_reason":"tool_use","model_reported":"rules-1","usage":{"input":0,"output":0,"thoughts":0,"cached":0},"thoughts":null,"vendor":false,"wall_ms":0.5732499994337559}}
{"call_id":"call_61421e98","run_id":"20261015T170957Z-suite-crb_papers-baseline-dae0c1/crb_papers.q113/e1a1","step":"analysis","kind":"note","name":"analyst.guard","version":"","code_version":"2925aeab2262","inputs":{},"input_digest":"","dataset_digests":{},"result":null,"outputs":null,"output_digest":"","params_versions":[],"sources":[],"started_at":"2026-10-15T17:10:00.279997Z","duration_ms":0.0,"error":null,"decided_by":"code","rationale":"","cached":false,"informed_by":[],"model":null,"prompt":null,"response":null,"tokens_in":null,"tokens_out":null,"meta":{"turn_id":"call_1a20a058","numbers_found":[],"unbacked":[],"uncited":[],"invalid_refs":[],"empty":false,"verdict":"accepted","retries_left":1,"vendor_id":"baseline_answer"}}