{
  "about": "CauSciBench native output: 'record' has the shape their evaluation/extract.py reads (a run's records in one list rescore with their evaluation/run_evaluation.py); the method is the tool-family label of the answer call (tool-family accuracy from tool calls, not a method the model named); 'scores' are the per-item terms of evaluation/metrics.py.",
  "answer_ref": "call_f2ac081a:coef.contacted_4weeks",
  "attempt": 1,
  "epoch": 1,
  "gold": {
    "effect": 0.005,
    "effect_as_stored": "0.005",
    "is_significant": 0,
    "source_id": "causcibench_real.gold.q073",
    "std_error": 0.013,
    "std_error_as_stored": "0.013"
  },
  "label": {
    "family": "iv",
    "method": "iv",
    "rule": "two-stage least squares",
    "tool_id": "infer.iv_2sls"
  },
  "native_id": 73,
  "precision_limited": true,
  "record": {
    "dataset_path": "data/csv_files/realdata/panagopoulos_timing.csv",
    "effect": 0.005,
    "method": "iv",
    "name": "Timing is everything? Primacy and recency effects in voter mobilization campaigns",
    "query": "What is the effect of receiving a get-out-the-vote phone call four weeks prior to the election on voter turnout?",
    "result": {
      "final_result": {
        "causal_effect": 0.006643934362992571,
        "covariates": [
          "democrat",
          "republican",
          "unenrolled",
          "other_party",
          "age",
          "age_squared",
          "vtr_gen01",
          "vtr_gen03"
        ],
        "method": "iv",
        "outcome_variable": "vtr_gen05",
        "standard_deviation": 0.013213288842595752,
        "treatment_variable": "contacted_4weeks"
      },
      "retries": null
    }
  },
  "scores": {
    "control_overlap": 1.0,
    "effect_correct": 0,
    "method_correct": 1,
    "outcome_match": 1,
    "relative_error_pct": 32.87868725985141,
    "treatment_match": 1
  },
  "status": "failed",
  "task_id": "causcibench_real.q073"
}