{"part":"task","text":"# Datasets\nPass a dataset's id as the `dataset` argument.\n{\n \"id\": \"uji_comparing_public\",\n \"rows\": 870,\n \"description\": \"This data comes from a survey administered in the state of Washington. Adults 18 years and older were first asked to read about the challenges to addressing the rising demands of energy while meeting decarbonization goals. To begin with, the participants were asked to answer attention-check questions. These were multiple-choice questions. Then, the participants were asked to indicate their degree of support for nuclear and wind energy sources. Additionally, participants were asked questions about factors that explain their preference for wind or nuclear energy sources.\\n\\nDataset Variables:\\nOutcome: The difference in support level between nuclear and wind (nuclear support % minus wind support %)\\nNuclear: Level of nuclear support (0-100%)\\nWind: Level of wind support (0-100%)\\nDist_nuclear: Distance in miles from respondent's county to the Richland nuclear power plant\\nDist_wind: Distance in miles from respondent's county to the closest wind facility\\nRegion: Geographic region (Eastern or Western Washington)\\nUrban_rural: Binary variable indicating whether respondents live in urban (county population >10,000) or rural areas; 1 = urban, 0 = rural\\nHealth: Importance attached to health effects of electricity generation and waste disposal (scale 1-4, where 1=\\\"\\\"not important at all\\\"\\\", 4=\\\"\\\"very important\\\"\\\")\\nJob: Importance attached to local jobs and economic benefits (scale 1-4, where 1=\\\"\\\"not important at all\\\"\\\", 4=\\\"\\\"very important\\\"\\\")\\nLandscape: Importance attached to disruption of the rural landscape (scale 1-4, where 1=\\\"\\\"not important at all\\\"\\\", 4=\\\"\\\"very important\\\"\\\")\\nSupply: Importance attached to reliability of electricity supply (scale 1-4, where 1=\\\"\\\"not important at all\\\"\\\", 4=\\\"\\\"very important\\\"\\\")\\nTrust_reg: Trust in the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1 = no trust at all, 4 = trust very strongly)\\nTrust_health: Trust in Washington State Department of Health (1 = no trust at all, 4 = trust very strongly)\\nTrust_plant: Trust in nuclear plant operators (1 = no trust at all, 4 = trust very strongly)\\nEnv: Environmental attitude - priority given to environmental protection (1) vs. economic growth (2)\\nGender: Respondent gender\\nAge: Age categories by birth year (1946-1964, 1965-1996, After 1996)\\nIncome: Income categories ($40,000-$69,999, $70,000-$104,999, $105,000-$159,999, $160,000+)\\nEducation: Education level (High school incomplete, High school, College no degree, 4 yrs college, Graduate school)\\nRace: Racial/ethnic identification\\nReligion: Religious affiliation\\nPID: Party identification (Democrat, Independent, Republican)\\nAC1: Attention check question 1 answer\\nAC2: Attention check question 2 answer\\nAC3: Attention check question 3 answer\\nAC: Overall attention check performance\",\n \"columns\": {\n  \"Outcome\": \"int64\",\n  \"Nuclear\": \"int64\",\n  \"Wind\": \"int64\",\n  \"Dist_nuclear\": \"float64\",\n  \"Dist_wind\": \"float64\",\n  \"Region\": \"str\",\n  \"Urban_rural\": \"int64\",\n  \"Health\": \"int64\",\n  \"Job\": \"int64\",\n  \"Landscape\": \"int64\",\n  \"Supply\": \"int64\",\n  \"Trust_reg\": \"int64\",\n  \"Trust_health\": \"int64\",\n  \"Trust_plant\": \"int64\",\n  \"Env\": \"int64\",\n  \"Gender\": \"str\",\n  \"Age\": \"str\",\n  \"Income\": \"str\",\n  \"Education\": \"str\",\n  \"Race\": \"str\",\n  \"Religion\": \"str\",\n  \"PID\": \"str\",\n  \"AC1\": \"int64\",\n  \"AC2\": \"int64\",\n  \"AC3\": \"int64\",\n  \"AC\": \"int64\"\n }\n}"}