{"args":{},"checks":[{"abs_tol":null,"bind":"any","column":null,"failure_class":null,"field":"value","interval":false,"key":null,"kind":"answer_backed","min_lre":null,"note":"every number in the answer was stated by a tool call","open_interval":false,"rel_tol":null,"required":true,"source_id":null,"table":null,"tool":null,"value":null,"weight":1.0,"where":null},{"abs_tol":null,"bind":"answer_call","column":null,"failure_class":null,"field":"value","interval":false,"key":null,"kind":"answer_figure_close","min_lre":null,"note":"CauSciBench effect accuracy: |answer figure \u2212 gold| \u2264 5% of |gold|","open_interval":false,"rel_tol":0.05,"required":true,"source_id":"causcibench_real.gold.q113","table":null,"tool":null,"value":-21.621,"weight":1.0,"where":null}],"datasets":{"gonzalez_blame_shifting":{"columns":null,"description":"This dataset comes from a comprehensive archival review of Latin American governments spanning multiple decades. It combines digitized historical records, semi-supervised machine learning to classify calls for ministerial resignation, and survey-based presidential approval estimates to study the corrective effects of ministerial dismissals on presidential popularity. The dataset includes quarterly observations and political, economic, and institutional covariates to analyze blame-shifting dynamics in presidential systems.\n\nVariables:\ncountry: Name of the country corresponding to the quarterly observation\nhoneymoon_1q: Dummy indicating the first quarter of a newly inaugurated presidential term (1 = yes; 0 = no)\nhoneymoon_2q: Dummy indicating the second quarter of a presidential term's honeymoon period (1 = yes; 0 = no)\nhoneymoon_3q: Dummy indicating the third quarter of a presidential term's honeymoon period (1 = yes; 0 = no)\npreelection_1q: Dummy indicating one quarter before a scheduled presidential election (1 = yes; 0 = no)\npreelection_2q: Dummy indicating two quarters before a scheduled presidential election (1 = yes; 0 = no)\ndismissal_tainted: Number of ministers dismissed after receiving calls for resignation\nage: Average age of all cabinet members at the end of the quarter\nnonpartisan: Proportion of ministers in the cabinet who are not affiliated with any political party\ninflation: Quarterly inflation rate (World Bank)\ngdp: Gross domestic product metric (World Bank)\nallhouse: Binary indicator whether president's party holds absolute majority in legislative houses (1 = yes; 0 = no)\ngovfrac: Index measuring probability two government deputies belong to different parties (0-1)\nreelect_last_year: Binary indicating if president could run for re-election in last year of term (1 = yes; 0 = no)\ncoalition: Binary indicating presence of multi-party governing coalition (1 = yes; 0 = no)\nlagged_approval: Prior quarter's smoothed presidential approval estimate\napproval: Smoothed quarterly presidential approval measure (current quarter)\nlagged_rc: Aggregate number of calls for resignation received by any cabinet member in previous quarter\nlagged_dism_tainted: Number of tainted ministers dismissed in previous quarter\nlagged_age: Average age of cabinet members in previous quarter\nlagged_nonpartisan: Proportion of nonpartisan ministers in previous quarter's cabinet\nvisibility: Binary indicating whether calls for resignation concerned high-visibility topics (1 = yes; 0 = no)\nqtr: Unique identifier for each quarterly observation (YYYYqN)","file_sha256":"608c8167bc620dbb0e614d2a37512458559440537c20ad401d25603915e7727b","format":"csv","frame_sha256":null,"generator":null,"kind":"file","licence":"CC0 1.0 (CauSciBench data/README.md); original source https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/QNCYOQ","member":null,"object":null,"params":{},"path":null,"read_kw":{},"records":null,"role":"agent","sha256":"608c8167bc620dbb0e614d2a37512458559440537c20ad401d25603915e7727b","transforms":[],"url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/causal-nlp/causcibench/resolve/d8aca99042e0bf1d73120a9dc1b65d4079fa1c3a/csv_files/realdata/gonzalez_blame_shifting.csv"}},"difficulty":"M","id":"causcibench_real.q113","level":"T2","meta":{"agent_reach":{"blocked_by":["no_reference_path","needs_spec:control:lagged_rc_sq"],"dtypes":{"gonzalez_blame_shifting":{"approval":"float64","lagged_dism_tainted":"float64"}},"named":{"outcome":["approval"],"treatment":["lagged_dism_tainted"]},"reachable":false,"rule":"magi_bench.reach/1"},"answer_format":{"figure_transform":"identity","round_to":null,"unit_scale":1.0},"cluster":"paper:A blame shifting in presidential systems: Ministerial terminations corrective effect on approval","gold":{"effect":-21.621,"effect_as_stored":"-21.621","is_significant":1,"source_id":"causcibench_real.gold.q113","std_error":5.689,"std_error_as_stored":"5.689"},"metadata":{"control_variables":"lagged_rc,lagged_rc_sq,visibility,allhouse,coalition,reelect_last_year,govfrac,gdp,inflation,honeymoon_2q,honeymoon_3q,preelection_1q,preelection_2q","dataset_path":"data/csv_files/realdata/gonzalez_blame_shifting.csv","effect":-21.621,"id":113,"instrument_var":"lagged_nonpartisan, lagged_age, lagged_age_sq","interaction_var":null,"is_rct":false,"is_significant":1,"method":"iv","name":"A blame shifting in presidential systems: Ministerial terminations corrective effect on approval","outcome_var":"approval","running_var":null,"state_var":null,"std_error":5.689,"temporal_var":null,"treatment_var":"lagged_dism_tainted"},"naive":{"dataset":"gonzalez_blame_shifting","treatment":"lagged_dism_tainted","y":"approval"},"name":"A blame shifting in presidential systems: Ministerial terminations corrective effect on approval","native_id":113,"outcome":"approval","pin":{"data_repo":"causal-nlp/causcibench","data_revision":"d8aca99042e0bf1d73120a9dc1b65d4079fa1c3a","repo":"causalNLP/CauSciBench","revision":"d9bb43a2d90f261978cc5ac0b628c0484f6e8956"},"precision_limited":false,"reference_notes":["the control 'lagged_rc_sq' is not a column of the CSV"],"reference_path":{"calls":[],"needs":["needs_spec:control:lagged_rc_sq"],"provenance":"none","quotes":{"control:lagged_rc_sq":"control_variables: lagged_rc,lagged_rc_sq,visibility,allhouse,coalition,reelect_last_year,govfrac,gdp,inflation,honeymoon_2q,honeymoon_3q,preelection_1q,preelection_2q"},"reference_datasets":[],"source_id":null},"reference_rule":"causcibench_metadata_rule/1","source":"causcibench","treatment":"lagged_dism_tainted"},"question":"How does dismissing tainted ministers affect presidential approval?","requires":[],"runner":null,"sources":["causcibench_real.gold.q113"],"split":"public","suite":"causcibench_real","tags":["econ-bench","external","causcibench","method:iv"],"target":"agent","tool":null,"truth":"CauSciBench real_input.json @ d9bb43a, id 113: effect -21.621"}