{
  "about": "CauSciBench native output: 'record' has the shape their evaluation/extract.py reads (a run's records in one list rescore with their evaluation/run_evaluation.py); the method is the tool-family label of the answer call (tool-family accuracy from tool calls, not a method the model named); 'scores' are the per-item terms of evaluation/metrics.py.",
  "answer_ref": "call_bd4da30d:coef.treated",
  "attempt": 1,
  "epoch": 1,
  "gold": {
    "effect": 0.009,
    "effect_as_stored": "0.009",
    "is_significant": 0,
    "source_id": "causcibench_real.gold.q072",
    "std_error": 0.011,
    "std_error_as_stored": "0.011"
  },
  "label": {
    "family": "ols",
    "method": "ols",
    "rule": "regression",
    "tool_id": "infer.ols"
  },
  "native_id": 72,
  "precision_limited": true,
  "record": {
    "dataset_path": "data/csv_files/realdata/panagopoulos_timing.csv",
    "effect": 0.009,
    "method": "iv",
    "name": "Timing is everything? Primacy and recency effects in voter mobilization campaigns",
    "query": "What is the effect of being contacted by a get-out-the-vote phone call on voter turnout in the November 2005 Rochester, NY election?",
    "result": {
      "final_result": {
        "causal_effect": 0.051738095238095236,
        "covariates": [],
        "method": "ols",
        "outcome_variable": "vtr_gen05",
        "standard_deviation": 0.008586126570666555,
        "treatment_variable": "treated"
      },
      "retries": null
    }
  },
  "scores": {
    "control_overlap": 1.0,
    "effect_correct": 0,
    "method_correct": 0,
    "outcome_match": 1,
    "relative_error_pct": 100,
    "treatment_match": 1
  },
  "status": "failed",
  "task_id": "causcibench_real.q072"
}