{"args":{},"checks":[{"abs_tol":null,"bind":"any","column":null,"failure_class":null,"field":"value","interval":false,"key":null,"kind":"answer_backed","min_lre":null,"note":"every number in the answer was stated by a tool call","open_interval":false,"rel_tol":null,"required":true,"source_id":null,"table":null,"tool":null,"value":null,"weight":1.0,"where":null},{"abs_tol":null,"bind":"answer_call","column":null,"failure_class":null,"field":"value","interval":false,"key":null,"kind":"answer_figure_close","min_lre":null,"note":"CauSciBench effect accuracy: |answer figure \u2212 gold| \u2264 5% of |gold|","open_interval":false,"rel_tol":0.05,"required":true,"source_id":"causcibench_real.gold.q050","table":null,"tool":null,"value":20471.057,"weight":1.0,"where":null}],"datasets":{"eckhouse_metrics_management":{"columns":null,"description":"This dataset is an agency-year panel that links police-reported crime, clearances, and unfounded counts to population, mortality, and local political context, tracking the timing and status of metrics-focused management practices within U.S. law enforcement agencies. The unit of observation is the police agency by calendar year, identified by a standard agency code and geographic identifiers.\n\nThe variables are:\nAGENCY: Agency name used in reporting\nYEAR: Calendar year of the observation for the agency\nORI: Agency's Originating Agency Identifier used in federal crime reporting systems\nSTATE: State of the agency's jurisdiction\nCOUNTY: County of the agency's jurisdiction\nPOP: Jurisdiction population for the agency-year (denominator for rate variables)\nCOMPSTAT: Indicator for adoption of a metrics-focused management program by the agency\nCOMPSTATDATE: Date (or year) of the agency's program adoption as recorded in the source\nHASCOMPSTAT: Indicator equal to 1 in years at or after adoption, and 0 otherwise\nYEAR.UNFOUNDED.MURDER: Count of homicides deemed unfounded in the agency-year\nYEAR.UNFOUNDED.RAPE.TOT: Count of rapes deemed unfounded in the agency-year\nYEAR.UNFOUND.AUTO.THFT: Count of motor vehicle thefts deemed unfounded in the agency-year\nYEAR.ACT.NUM.MURDER: Count of homicide offenses known to the agency in the year (UCR \"\"actual\"\" offenses)\nYEAR.ACT.NUM.RAPE.TOT: Count of rape offenses known to the agency in the year\nYEAR.ACT.NUM.ASSAULT.TOT: Count of aggravated assault offenses known to the agency in the year\nYEAR.ACT.VHC.THFT.TOT: Count of motor vehicle theft offenses known to the agency in the year\nYEAR.ACT.ALL.FIELDS: Total \"\"actual\"\" offenses across included categories in the agency-year\nYEAR.TOT.CLR.MURDER: Number of homicide offenses cleared (by arrest or exceptional means) in the agency-year\nYEAR.TOT.CLR.RAPE.TOT: Number of rape offenses cleared in the agency-year\nYEAR.TOT.CLR.ASSAULT.TOT: Number of aggravated assaults cleared in the agency-year; YEAR.TOT.CLR.VHC.THFT.TOT: Number of motor vehicle thefts cleared in the agency-year\nYEAR.TOT.CLR.ALL.FIELDS: Total clearances across included categories in the agency-year\nSHAREPT2: Share of Part II arrests in total arrests (proportion)\nclearrate: Overall clearance rate across included offense categories (clearances divided by offenses)\nunfoundrapepct: Percent of reported rapes deemed unfounded\nmurderclearrate: Clearance rate for homicide\nrapeclearrate: Clearance rate for rape\nassaultclearrate: Clearance rate for aggravated assault\nunfoundmurderpct: Percent of reported homicides deemed unfounded\nunfoundassaultpct: Percent of reported aggravated assaults deemed unfounded\nPART1arrests: Count of arrests for UCR Part I offenses in the agency-year\nPART2arrests: Count of arrests for UCR Part II offenses in the agency-year\npopblackpct: Percent of the jurisdiction's population identified as Black/African American\npopwhitepct: Percent of the jurisdiction's population identified as White\nunfoundautopct: Percent of reported motor vehicle thefts deemed unfounded\nyearssincecompstat: Years elapsed since the agency's adoption year (constructed relative to COMPSTATDATE)\nFIPS_PLACE_ID: FIPS place identifier for the agency's primary jurisdiction\ncdcHomicide: Cause-specific mortality measure for homicide matched to the agency's geography (level/units follow source coding)\ncdcSuicide: Cause-specific mortality measure for suicide matched to the agency's geography (level/units follow source coding)\ncdcUndetermined: Cause-specific mortality measure for undetermined intent matched to the agency's geography (level/units follow source coding)\ncdcUnintentional: Cause-specific mortality measure for unintentional injury matched to the agency's geography (level/units follow source coding)\nhaselection: Indicator equal to 1 if a relevant local election occurred for the agency's jurisdiction in that year\nyears_since_election: Years since the most recent relevant local election for the agency's jurisdiction\npartisantotal: Summary measure of local political partisanship for the jurisdiction (construction follows source coding)\nincidentsperpop: Total incidents per population (offenses divided by POP), a per-capita incident rate\nautoclearrate: Clearance rate for motor vehicle theft\nYEAR.ACT.NUM.KILLINGS: Count of killings as coded in the source (maintained separately from homicide for internal consistency and checks)","file_sha256":"b303608e3fc216acfb6520b968a7a6de354eb1248fdd53ac70671f7eb04f1298","format":"csv","frame_sha256":null,"generator":null,"kind":"file","licence":"CC0 1.0 (CauSciBench data/README.md); original source https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/3E7JXB","member":null,"object":null,"params":{},"path":null,"read_kw":{},"records":null,"role":"agent","sha256":"b303608e3fc216acfb6520b968a7a6de354eb1248fdd53ac70671f7eb04f1298","transforms":[],"url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/causal-nlp/causcibench/resolve/d8aca99042e0bf1d73120a9dc1b65d4079fa1c3a/csv_files/realdata/eckhouse_metrics_management.csv"}},"difficulty":"M","id":"causcibench_real.q050","level":"T2","meta":{"agent_reach":{"blocked_by":[],"dtypes":{"eckhouse_metrics_management":{"AGENCY":"str","HASCOMPSTAT":"int64","PART2arrests":"float64","POP":"int64","YEAR":"int64"}},"named":{"outcome":["PART2arrests"],"treatment":["HASCOMPSTAT"]},"reachable":true,"rule":"magi_bench.reach/1"},"answer_format":{"figure_transform":"identity","round_to":null,"unit_scale":1.0},"cluster":"paper:Metrics management and bureaucratic accountability: Evidence from policing","gold":{"effect":20471.057,"effect_as_stored":"20471.057","is_significant":1,"source_id":"causcibench_real.gold.q050","std_error":6339.787,"std_error_as_stored":"6339.787"},"headline_keys":{"infer.ols":["coef.HASCOMPSTAT"]},"metadata":{"control_variables":"POP","dataset_path":"data/csv_files/realdata/eckhouse_metrics_management.csv","effect":20471.057,"id":50,"instrument_var":null,"interaction_var":null,"is_rct":false,"is_significant":1,"method":"did","name":"Metrics management and bureaucratic accountability: Evidence from policing","outcome_var":"PART2arrests","running_var":null,"state_var":"AGENCY","std_error":6339.787,"temporal_var":"YEAR","treatment_var":"HASCOMPSTAT"},"naive":{"dataset":"eckhouse_metrics_management","treatment":"HASCOMPSTAT","y":"PART2arrests"},"name":"Metrics management and bureaucratic accountability: Evidence from policing","native_id":50,"outcome":"PART2arrests","pin":{"data_repo":"causal-nlp/causcibench","data_revision":"d8aca99042e0bf1d73120a9dc1b65d4079fa1c3a","repo":"causalNLP/CauSciBench","revision":"d9bb43a2d90f261978cc5ac0b628c0484f6e8956"},"precision_limited":false,"reference":{"cite":1,"steps":[{"args":{"controls":["POP"],"dataset":"eckhouse_metrics_management","fe":["AGENCY","YEAR"],"x":["HASCOMPSTAT"],"y":"PART2arrests"},"tool":"infer.ols","why":"causcibench_metadata_rule/1: did"}]},"reference_notes":["the treatment varies within AGENCY: two-way fixed effects for AGENCY and YEAR"],"reference_path":{"calls":[{"args":{"controls":["POP"],"dataset":"eckhouse_metrics_management","fe":["AGENCY","YEAR"],"x":["HASCOMPSTAT"],"y":"PART2arrests"},"tool":"infer.ols"}],"needs":[],"provenance":"metadata_rule","quotes":{},"reference_datasets":[],"source_id":null},"reference_rule":"causcibench_metadata_rule/1","source":"causcibench","treatment":"HASCOMPSTAT"},"question":"What is the effect of CompStat adoption on the number of Part 2 arrests?","requires":[],"runner":null,"sources":["causcibench_real.gold.q050"],"split":"public","suite":"causcibench_real","tags":["econ-bench","external","causcibench","method:did"],"target":"agent","tool":null,"truth":"CauSciBench real_input.json @ d9bb43a, id 50: effect 20471.057"}