{"args":{},"checks":[{"abs_tol":null,"bind":"any","column":null,"failure_class":null,"field":"value","interval":false,"key":null,"kind":"answer_backed","min_lre":null,"note":"every number in the answer was stated by a tool call","open_interval":false,"rel_tol":null,"required":true,"source_id":null,"table":null,"tool":null,"value":null,"weight":1.0,"where":null},{"abs_tol":null,"bind":"answer_call","column":null,"failure_class":null,"field":"value","interval":false,"key":null,"kind":"answer_figure_close","min_lre":null,"note":"CauSciBench effect accuracy: |answer figure \u2212 gold| \u2264 5% of |gold|","open_interval":false,"rel_tol":0.05,"required":true,"source_id":"causcibench_real.gold.q115","table":null,"tool":null,"value":-1.207,"weight":1.0,"where":null}],"datasets":{"taddeo_causal":{"columns":null,"description":"This data analyzes the demographic impacts of the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak. The virus was first detected in 2015; the state of Pernambuco (PE) was strongly affected by the epidemic, while the southernmost state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) had no reported case. The data consists of a time series of annual births and birth rates extracted from administrative databases on 682 municipalities (185 in PE and 497 in RS) during the period from 2008 to 2016.\n\nDataset variables:\n- StudyYear: The year of data collection\n- Code: Municipality code\n- Births: Overall number of births in a year\n- BirthSchool: Births among mothers >= 8 years of schooling\n- Rate: Birth rate\n- trt: Whether a municipality experienced the Zika epidemic or not (1 = state of Pernambuco, 0 = Rio Grande do Sul )\n- year: Indicator for study year (1 = After 2015, the year when virus was detected; 0 = Before 2015)\n- interaction: Interaction between trt and year\n- Pop: Total population count for each municipality","file_sha256":"993a5c5eb299039f6a093885c9befad4b9084a6f4aebe615c5b7a64b7057fe29","format":"csv","frame_sha256":null,"generator":null,"kind":"file","licence":"CC0 1.0 (CauSciBench data/README.md); original source https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/ENG0IY","member":null,"object":null,"params":{},"path":null,"read_kw":{},"records":null,"role":"agent","sha256":"993a5c5eb299039f6a093885c9befad4b9084a6f4aebe615c5b7a64b7057fe29","transforms":[],"url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/causal-nlp/causcibench/resolve/d8aca99042e0bf1d73120a9dc1b65d4079fa1c3a/csv_files/realdata/taddeo_causal.csv"}},"difficulty":"M","id":"causcibench_real.q115","level":"T2","meta":{"agent_reach":{"blocked_by":[],"dtypes":{"taddeo_causal":{"Rate":"float64","interaction":"float64","trt":"float64","year":"float64"}},"named":{"outcome":["Rate"],"treatment":["interaction"]},"reachable":true,"rule":"magi_bench.reach/1"},"answer_format":{"figure_transform":"identity","round_to":null,"unit_scale":1.0},"cluster":"paper:Causal measures using generalized difference-in-difference approach with nonlinear models","gold":{"effect":-1.207,"effect_as_stored":"-1.207","is_significant":1,"source_id":"causcibench_real.gold.q115","std_error":0.339,"std_error_as_stored":"0.339"},"headline_keys":{"infer.ols":["coef.interaction"]},"metadata":{"control_variables":null,"dataset_path":"data/csv_files/realdata/taddeo_causal.csv","effect":-1.207,"id":115,"instrument_var":null,"interaction_var":null,"is_rct":false,"is_significant":1,"method":"did","name":"Causal measures using generalized difference-in-difference approach with nonlinear models","outcome_var":"Rate","running_var":null,"state_var":"trt","std_error":0.339,"temporal_var":"year","treatment_var":"interaction"},"naive":{"dataset":"taddeo_causal","treatment":"interaction","y":"Rate"},"name":"Causal measures using generalized difference-in-difference approach with nonlinear models","native_id":115,"outcome":"Rate","pin":{"data_repo":"causal-nlp/causcibench","data_revision":"d8aca99042e0bf1d73120a9dc1b65d4079fa1c3a","repo":"causalNLP/CauSciBench","revision":"d9bb43a2d90f261978cc5ac0b628c0484f6e8956"},"precision_limited":false,"reference":{"cite":1,"steps":[{"args":{"controls":[],"dataset":"taddeo_causal","fe":["trt","year"],"x":["interaction"],"y":"Rate"},"tool":"infer.ols","why":"causcibench_metadata_rule/1: did"}]},"reference_notes":["the treatment varies within trt: two-way fixed effects for trt and year"],"reference_path":{"calls":[{"args":{"controls":[],"dataset":"taddeo_causal","fe":["trt","year"],"x":["interaction"],"y":"Rate"},"tool":"infer.ols"}],"needs":[],"provenance":"metadata_rule","quotes":{},"reference_datasets":[],"source_id":null},"reference_rule":"causcibench_metadata_rule/1","source":"causcibench","treatment":"interaction"},"question":"Does the presence of a Zika epidemic in a municipality lead to lower birth rates?","requires":[],"runner":null,"sources":["causcibench_real.gold.q115"],"split":"public","suite":"causcibench_real","tags":["econ-bench","external","causcibench","method:did"],"target":"agent","tool":null,"truth":"CauSciBench real_input.json @ d9bb43a, id 115: effect -1.207"}